Apparemment, la diplomatie française rêvait d’images où l’on verrait, seuls, Nicolas Sarkozy et Barack Obama, les pans de vestes balayés par le vent de la liberté. Mais la diplomatie française devrait réviser ses classiques. Impossible d’honorer la mémoire des morts sans associer les dirigeants des pays qui ont participé au sacrifice. Ne pas inviter la reine d’Angleterre, voire même le premier ministre canadien, et pourquoi pas l’australien, serait insupportable, et presque honteux. (…) Ce loupé trahit une obsession du pouvoir français. Il s’agit, encore et toujours, aujourd’hui comme hier, de se mesurer à la puissance américaine. Nous continuons à vivre dans l’illusion d’un tête-à-tête avec l’Amérique. Nous continuons, au fond de nos consciences, car nos intelligences bien sûr l’ont enregistré, à refuser la domination d’un pays si jeune et sans histoire, deux siècles à peine, des blancs becs, sur un pays saturé d’épreuves et qui a naguère illuminé le monde par la puissance de ses idées. Alors, chaque fois que nous le pouvons, dans la célébration de l’amitié le plus souvent, mais parfois aussi dans l’opposition, nous organisons des rencontres avec l’Amérique pour montrer à la planète que le dialogue se fait à égalité, entre pairs, entre grands du monde, France et Amérique, car la France ne saurait être en rien inférieure à l’Amérique. (…) dans l’esprit des décideurs et des organisateurs, l’important n’était peut-être pas tant la célébration de la mémoire que la mise en scène de la rencontre de deux présidents fraîchement installés, partenaires et rivaux à la fois, concurrents et alliés, figure classique de la relation franco-américaine. Jean-Michel Aphatie
Obama va-t-il finir par demander pardon pour la 2e Guerre mondiale?
Après Hiroshima, le « génocide indien », l’esclavage, la discrimination …
Et, pour faire oublier les GI’s barbares, notre Chirac national qui la dernière fois avait invité Poutine et Schroeder à Omaha beach …
Officiellement pour célébrer le 65e anniversaire du Débarquement de Normandie pour lequel, curieusement (mais il ne fallait peut-être pas trop encombrer les photos de notre Sarko national avec la rock star de Chicago?) le chef de l’Etat britannique, Elizabeth II dont les troupes formaient quand même la moitié des forces, ne sera pas invitée.
Mais les premiers contacts de l’équipe de la Maison Blanche avec les autorités de Dresde semblent pointer vers autre chose …
Comme, après le fameux rappel des mérites de l’islam et au train où le révisionnisme avance,… celui peut-être des incontournables apports du nazisme?
The Next Europe Trip: Will Obama Apologize for WWII?
May 12, 2009
According to reports in the German media, President Obama is planning a trip to Germany in the first week in June. The Germany trip would precede Obama’s June 6 participation in ceremonies in France marking the 65th anniversary of the Allied invasion of Normandy.
That Obama would be planning a trip to Germany in connection with ceremonies marking the anniversary of the Normandy invasion is already rather odd. Following the turning point represented by the Battle of Stalingrad, the invasion was, after all, the crucial event that all but guaranteed Germany’s defeat in the Second World War.
But when one considers just where exactly in Germany Obama is headed, then the significance of the visit becomes more clear. There is some talk of Obama visiting the Buchenwald concentration camp outside Weimar, in whose liberation Obama’s great uncle Charlie Payne is famously supposed to have taken part. But the Buchenwald visit appears not to be the main event and indeed it can be presumed to have been included in discussions as something of an alibi.
The latest German reports suggest Obama’s principal German destination will be Dresden. According to  an article in the local paper Die Dresdner Neueste Nachrichten, representatives of the German and American governments met in Dresden last Wednesday to discuss preparations for the visit. An American security detail is reported to have already scoped out sites in the city: presumably for a public speech.
The symbolic significance of a visit to Dresden by the American president — especially one undertaken in connection with a D-Day commemoration in France — may be missed by some Americans, but it is absolutely unmistakable for the German public. For Germans, Dresden is the symbol bar none of German suffering at the hands of the Allies. The city was heavily bombed by British and American air forces in February 1945, toward the end of the war. According to the most recent estimates of professional historians, anywhere from 18,000 to at most 25,000 persons died in the attacks. These numbers come from a historical commission established by the city of Dresden itself. But far higher numbers — ranging into the hundreds of thousands — have long circulated in Germany and beyond. The bombing of Dresden is commonly described as a “war crime” in German discussions.
Alleged crimes committed by the Allies against Germans and Germany have indeed become a sort of German literary obsession in recent years, with numerous books being devoted to the subject. The taste of the German public for the theme was made particularly clear by the enormous success of author Jörg Friedrich’s 2002 volume The Fire [Der Brand], which is about the Allied bombardment of Germany. The book’s success was so great that Friedrich and his publisher quickly followed up with  a picture book on the same topic titled Scenes of the Fire: How the Bombing Looked.
The rhetoric employed by Friedrich went so far as to suggest an equivalence between the Allied bombing of German cities and the genocidal conduct of Nazi Germany itself. In keeping with this rhetoric, the publisher’s original blurb for the volume described the Allied bombing campaign as a “campaign of extermination [Vernichtungskampagne] that was systemically planned and carried out by the British and Americans.” In the meanwhile, the publisher has toned down the formulation.  The current version of the blurb “merely” speaks of a “terror campaign against German cities and their residents that was systematically planned and carried out by the British and Americans.”
As a result of the passions provoked or released by Friedrich’s book, the expression “Bombing-Holocaust” has passed into the German lexicon. Although especially favored by so-called “extreme right” circles (i.e., more-or-less openly neo-Nazi ones), the term merely expresses what is implicit in ostensibly more mainstream discourse.
It is virtually unthinkable that Obama could give a speech in Dresden and not allude to the bombing of the city. Most of the city’s historical monuments — which Obama’s advance team were apparently inspecting — were severely damaged or destroyed in the bombing and had to be rebuilt. Moreover, for Obama to visit both Dresden and Buchenwald would suggest precisely the sort of outrageous parallels that have become commonplace in Germany at least since the publication of Friedrich’s The Fire.
(As so happens, although tens of thousands of persons died there, Buchenwald was not one of the camps specifically devoted to the extermination of Jews. But far be it from Obama to know that. When, during the election campaign, he first referred to his Uncle Charlie’s WWII exploits, he said that his uncle had helped to liberate “Auschwitz.” Moreover, Charlie Payne did not really participate in the liberation of Buchenwald either, but rather in that of Ohrdruf: a lesser-known, affiliated camp some sixty kilometers away.)
As discussed in my earlier PJM report  here, the principal sponsor of Obama’s literary career has been Germany’s Bertelsmann Corporation, which offered him a reported $2 million advance when he was still largely unknown. Obama’s 2004-2008 tax returns list over $6 million in income from the Bertelsmann subsidiary Random House (and over $2 million in what appears to be indirect income from Random House). This would not be worth mentioning here, were it not the case that the “in-house” historian of Bertelsmann and the Mohn family, which controls the corporation, is none other than Dirk Bavendamm. As likewise discussed in  my earlier report, Bavendamm is an openly revisionist historian of the Second World War who, among other things, describes WWII as “Roosevelt’s war.”
As bizarre as it may seem, President Obama’s impending trip to Dresden suggests that German revisionists have a friend in the White House.
Obama and Dresden
What is he doing there? Making apologies for World War II?
The Wall Street Journal
June 5, 2009
On his way to the 65th D-Day commemorations in France, President Obama plans a curious stop-over in Germany, my home country. He will travel to Buchenwald, the concentration camp his great uncle helped liberate, a visit that makes personal and historical sense. It is his other German destination, Dresden, that seems out of place. Will the president, who likes to apologize for America’s alleged sins, now also apologize for World War II?
For many Germans, the destruction of Dresden in February 1945 has become a symbol of Allied « bombing terror. » Many still believe the true number of deaths is closer to the Nazi propaganda of 200,000 than the 20,000 to 35,000 historians believe is correct.
Google « Dresden » and « Kriegsverbrechen, » the German word for « war crimes, » and you’ll get almost 26,000 results. Neo-Nazis marched through the streets of Dresden this February commemorating the « Bombing Holocaust. » A flood of recent books, articles and documentaries has shifted Germany’s historical debate from its war crimes to its own war victims. As part of this trend, in 2006 public TV station ZDF broadcast « Dresden: The Inferno, » the most expensive German television production at the time. Its graphic display of carnage and burning people is at odds with German movie tradition. Films about the Holocaust tend to be more subtle and less emotional.
Mr. Obama’s visit to Dresden is an unfortunate gesture. Even if the president were not to make an outright apology for the allied bombings, he could hardly not mention them in this city so preoccupied with its wartime history. And even if he were not to give any speech at all and just toured the city, he’d inevitably be led to the many landmarks that were once reduced to rubble.
His mere presence in Dresden — on the heels of a visit to Buchenwald and just before attending the Normandy commemorations — would boost the revisionist cause. It would suggest a sort of moral equivalence between industrialized genocide and the bombings of German cities — bombings, remember, that were designed to bring an end to the genocidal regime.
Mr. Obama’s encounter with the reality of governing does not seem to have tempered his appetite for second-guessing past U.S. presidents. Having already come close to a mea culpa for America’s use of atomic bombs against Japan, he may now add Dresden to the revisionist charges against the U.S. Even if the president doesn’t say that America lost its moral bearings by bombing Dresden, people will read between the lines of his visit.
Mr. Schwammenthal is an editorial writer for The Wall Street Journal Europe.